It is well known that Oerth is the center of the Primary Plane. There are 3 massive bodies around it: The sun Liga, and the two moons Luna and its small sister Celene.
Shadowwise^{*} or counter-shadowwise?
^{*}Shadowwise is the way the shadows rotate. It is sometimes called clockwise - word from an unknown origin.
Seen from above the North pole
Liga rises in the East and sets in the West. This is due to the rotation of Oerth on itself. So 1 is counter-shadowwise.
Both moons have the following phases:
The sun is almost motionless compared to the moons cycles, so that 2 is counter-shadowwise too.
The visible Fixed Stars change along the year. Constellations set and rise earlier every day. Each month, before sunrise, a new zodiac constellation can be seen on the East of the previous ones (the left in the north emisphere). So that 3 is counter-shadowwise too.
Periods
Seen from Oerth, all look simple. The planet rotates around itself in exactly one day, Luna has a cycle of 28 days, Celene has a cycle of 91 days, and Liga's one is 364 days. However, the visible cycle - aka the synodic period - of the moons is relative to Liga's position, and it changes around the year.
If we consider Celene for exemple, two full moons are separated by 91 days.
But during that times, Liga made a quater of its cycle, so that in fact Celene real move in 91 days is 1.25 turns. Finally, Celene turns around earth 5 times a year while we see only 4 cycles:
In the very same way, Luna rotates Oerth 14 times a year, that is 1+364/28.
About distances
The Third Kepler Law define a relation between the distances and the periods: P_{luna}² / P_{celene}² = d_{luna}³ / d_{celene}³
The Period of Luna is P_{luna} = 1/14
The Period of Celene is P_{celene} = 1/5
That is d_{celene} = (P_{celene}/P_{luna})^{2/3} * d_{luna} = (14/5)^{2/3} * d_{luna} = 1.987 d_{luna}
So that Celene is about twice as far as Luna.
About volumes
It is well known that Celene looks a little smaller than Luna in the sky. However, Celene visible diameter is not very small since it can cause sun eclipses too. Let's imagine a moment that Celene actually looks 80% the size of Luna.
Celene is twice as far as Luna; so that Thales teach us that about radiuses (real ones, not visible ones): R_{celene} = 80% of 2 * R_{luna}
In other words, Celene is actually 1.6 times bigger in diameter than Luna (even if it looks smaller seen from Oerth)
A sphere volume depends on the cube of its radius (V=4Πr³/3) so that Celene volume is 1.6³ bigger. That is Celene is 4 times bigger than Luna.
About masses
Let's try to guess the mass of Celene. We know its volume is about 4 times Luna's one. But we don't know anything about its density.
If we accept the (big) assumption that the density of the two moons are roughtly the sames, the mass of Celene is 4 times the one of Luna.
Here are other possibilities:
Celene visible radius (/Luna) R |
Celene density (/Luna) D |
Celene mass (/Luna) (14/5)²*R³*D |
90% | 1.0 | 5.71536 |
80% | 1.0 | 4.01408 |
70% | 1.0 | 2.68912 |
60% | 1.0 | 1.69344 |
50% | 1.0 | 0.98 |
80% | 0.5 | 2.00704 |
80% | 0.75 | 3.01056 |
80% | 1.0 | 4.01408 |
80% | 1.5 | 6.02112 |
80% | 2.0 | 8.02816 |
About Gravitational forces
Now, if we use the Law of Universal gravitation F_{g}=G*m_{1}*m_{2}/r²
For Luna, we have
F_{luna} = G*m_{Oerth}*m_{luna}/d_{luna}²
And for Celene
F_{celene} = G*m_{Oerth}*m_{celene}/d_{celene}²
= G*m_{Oerth}*(15.6*m_{luna})/(2*d_{luna})²
= 1.6³/2² * F_{luna}
= 1.02 * F_{luna}
In other words, the gravitationnal effect of Celene is about the same than Luna's one.
Tides basics
Tides exists because the gravitational force depends of the distances, and Oerth is not really a point: The closest a point is to a mass, the strongest the attraction.
In the scheme above, the gravitational field of Luna is stronger at point 3 than at point 2, and stronger at point 2 than at point 1.The tidal force depends on the gradient of the gravitational field. Suppose another piece of matter is k centimeters farther in the same direction.Then it undergoes a smaller acceleration: Gm/(d+k)². The difference between these two accelerations can be ascribed to a tidal force pulling the two pieces apart. The estimation of this difference is a classic example of the linear approximation f(x+k) - f(x) ~ k f'(x). It yields -2 G m k / d³.
In other words, tides don't react the the square of the distance but to its cube. An other important concequence is that a body such as Luna causes 2 hight tides: One on each side of Oerth. That's why there is two hight tides and two low tides each day.
Tidal strengthes
Luna tidal strength is TS_{Luna} = -2 G m_{Oerth} m_{Luna} / d_{Luna}³
Celene tidal strength is TS_{Celene} = -2 G m_{Oerth} m_{Celene} / d_{Celene}³
But we know m_{Celene} = (14/5)² * (Visible radius_{Celene} / Visible radius_{Luna})³ * (Density _{Celene} / Density _{Luna}) * m_{Luna}
And d_{Celene} = (14/5)^{2/3}d_{Luna}
that means that d_{Celene}³ = (14/5)²d_{Luna}
After simplification:
TS_{Celene} = (Visible radius_{Celene} / Visible radius_{Luna})³ * (Density _{Celene} / Density _{Luna}) * TS_{Luna}
On Earth, the sun tidal force is 45% the one of the Moon. Luna is usually considered on Oerth as the equivalent of the Moon on Earth, so I'll keep these number for tide computation.
If we keep the above hypothesis that Celene visible radius is 80% Luna's one and that the densities are the same ones, we have the following tidal strengthes ratio
Here are the possibilities.
Celene visible radius (/Luna) R |
Celene density (/Luna) D |
Sun strenght C_{Sun} = 1 |
Luna strenght C_{Luna} = 2.22 |
Celene strenght C_{Celene} = R³ * D * C_{Luna} |
100% | 1.0 | 1.00 | 2.22 | 2.22 |
90% | 1.0 | 1.00 | 2.22 | 1.62 |
80% | 1.0 | 1.00 | 2.22 | 1.14 |
70% | 1.0 | 1.00 | 2.22 | 0.76 |
60% | 1.0 | 1.00 | 2.22 | 0.48 |
50% | 1.0 | 1.00 | 2.22 | 0.28 |
First model
In a first approximation, let's imgaine that Luna, Celene and Liga are all rotating in the same plane.
So we have the following tidal forces:
The biggest tide is when all three pulling forces are aligned. That event occurs only once a year, that is Richfeast the 4th, at noon. That day is called Sealords' feast in Greyhawk. (amazing, hu?)
The height of the water on a given hour h can be approximated by that very basic equation
t = h4Π/24
heigth = 1*cos(t) + 2.22*cos(t-t/28) + 1.14*cos(t-t/91)
Where h can simply be the number of hours since noon Richfeast, the 4th.
The perfect timing of these three masses revolution means that the water height is the same every year.
That model works pretty well if you are near the equator.
Latitude Influence
In order to get a better model, we have to take into account the latitude of the observer.
On the equator, the moons do reach the zenith. Their altitude varies bewteen +90° (zenith) and -90° (nadir). However, that amplitude becomes smaller and smaller when you go toward a pole. When you reach a pole, the moons circle the horizon on a 0 altitude.
Let's define t as the number of days this Sealords' feast, noon. We have these figures:
Alt_{Sun} = (Π/2-latitude) * cos(2*Π*t)
Alt_{Luna} = (latitude - Π/2) * cos(2*Π*t*27/28)
Alt_{Celene} = (latitude - Π/2) * cos(2*Π*t*90/91)
The tital impact of each body is maximal when the angles reaches the zenith or nadir, and is nul when the body is on the horizon:
Effect_{x} = 1/2 - cos(Altitude_{x}*2)/2
Finally, using the strenght computed above, we can approximate the water height:
H(t) = 1.0 * Effect_{Sun} + 2.22 * Effect_{Luna} + 1.14 * Effect_{Celene}
Sun height variation around the year (seasons)
Up to now, we consider that the sun maximal altitude in the sky was Π/2-latitude. However, there is a significant varation. Liga doesn't rotate in the sky like the moons around the equator. Its height follow the yearly variation of the fixed stars.
Let's call tropic the semi-yearly variation of the fixed stars angle. The sun height additional angle varation is tropic*cos(2*Π*t/364)).
As noted in the 1983 Glossography, page 20, the 60 degree north latitude line is Oerth's "arctic circle," north of which you get the phenomenon of the midnight sun. (The same thing happens, of course, south of the 60 degree south latitude line.) As a result of this increased tilt, Oerth should actually have more severe seasonal changes in climate than Earth does. Gods and magic can alter this, of course, but somewhere on Oerth it might get very hot in the summer and very cold in the winter.
Finally
If t is the number of days since noon Sealords' Feast, latitude the latitude of the observer on Oerth:
Alt_{Sun}(t) = (Π/2-latitude) * cos(2*Π*t) + Π/6*cos(2*Π*t/364))
Alt_{Luna}(t) = (latitude - Π/2) * cos(2*Π*t*27/28) Alt_{Celene}(t) = (latitude - Π/2) * cos(2*Π*t*90/91) Effect_{x}(t) = 1/2 - cos(Alt_{x}(t)*2)/2 H(t) = 1.0 * Effect_{Sun}(t) + 2.22 * Effect_{Luna}(t) + 1.14 * Effect_{Celene}(t) |
From SJR6 Greyspace, Celene seems to be between Oerth and Luna, even if it rotates more slowly. This is not physically possible, and would requiere some magic, whose effect I cannot compute. Moreover, a huge body so near Oerth would cause impossible huge tides. So, I just discarded that old tale.